The players threatened to boycott the team's game against BYU, which would have cost the university a cool $1 million. In 2015 at Missouri, when football players joined a protest on campus, due to the way the president of the university system handled complaints about racism. This formula isn't necessarily new, it's just never been seen at this scale in college football. However, because Pac-12 players are unified in this particular movement, have a clear list of demands and are threatening to not play in games, they are able to leverage what little power they do have to get into the pockets of schools and the NCAA. They aren't unionized, and have little-to-no power individually. There aren't a lot of ways for college athletes to affect change within the current system. (On Monday, Pac-12 commissioner Larry Scott said the conference is reviewing the group's concerns and would be discussing them with its members over the next couple of days.) The beautiful part is, they're going about it in the best way possible, providing the blueprint for movements that will undoubtedly be necessary in the future. This is the biggest movement we've seen by players in college football history. That's the only leverage college football players have ever had. The most important part here is where players say they will opt out of Pac-12 fall camp and games unless their demands are guaranteed in writing for not just scholarship athletes, but walk-ons, as well. You'd certainly want them for your child. However, if you are against the players gaining any of these things, it might be good to ask yourself why - because it would be inherently good if they did. The players demanded they receive safety precautions for the ongoing coronavirus pandemic, adequate testing for the virus, medical insurance for six years after eligibility ends, the ability to make money off of their names, images and likenesses, and 50% of each sport's total conference revenue evenly among athletes in their respective sports.Īrguments can be made for and against any of these things happening for the players, and we won't do that here.
On Sunday, a dozen Pac-12 football players released a unified statement in The Players' Tribune titled, "#WeAreUnited." In the statement, the players began by stating that NCAA sports "exploit college athletes physically, economically and academically, and also disproportionately harm Black college athletes." We don't know what they're going to get, but they will walk away with more than they came with because they're operating with the right blueprint.
Pac-12 players have organized a movement that is going to get them something. Why the Pac-12 protest is showing the blueprint for future college football progressĮditor's note: This story was originally published last week, but is newly relevant as prominent CFB stars pushed to "create a college football players association"
#Future football story upgrade
You have reached a degraded version of because you're using an unsupported version of Internet Explorer.įor a complete experience, please upgrade or use a supported browser
0 kommentar(er)
